AMD FirePro W4190M vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4190M and AMD Radeon R9 M275X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23384 vs 11041
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2529 vs 1228
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 1705
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2529 vs 1228
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 1705

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 November 2015 vs 28 January 2014
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	23384 vs 11041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	284.018 vs 283.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2529 vs 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3889 vs 1705
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2529 vs 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3889 vs 1705

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Around 9% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 825 MHz
Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 900 MHz
Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
Around 71% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 1155
2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 179
Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.187 vs 1.417
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 1704
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 1704

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 825 MHz
Boost clock speed	925 MHz vs 900 MHz
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,184 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1700 vs 1155
PassMark - G2D Mark	362 vs 179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.187 vs 1.417
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3265 vs 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3265 vs 1704

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4190M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1155

1700

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

179

362

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

23384

11041

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

284.018

283.116

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.417

2.187

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1704

3265

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2529

1228

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3889

1705

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1704

3265

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2529

1228

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3889

1705

Name	AMD FirePro W4190M	AMD Radeon R9 M275X
PassMark - G3D Mark	1155	1700
PassMark - G2D Mark	179	362
Geekbench - OpenCL	23384	11041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	284.018	283.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.417	2.187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1704	3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2529	1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3889	1705
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1704	3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2529	1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3889	1705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		28.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		33.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		91.407

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD FirePro W4190M	AMD Radeon R9 M275X
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Opal	Venus
Launch date	12 November 2015	28 January 2014
Place in performance rating	1073	1074
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	925 MHz
Core clock speed	825 MHz	900 MHz
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	1,184 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	640
Texture fill rate	21.6 GTexel / s	37 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,040 million	1,500 million
Compute units		10
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCIe 3.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	11
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Mantle
OpenCL		Not Listed
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	72 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
AppAcceleration
Enduro
Powerplay
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore