AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs ATI FirePro V7800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and ATI FirePro V7800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 700 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 354 vs 307
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9694 vs 4894
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.151 vs 15.084
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.321 vs 1.448
- 45.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 63
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 26 April 2010 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 vs 4894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 vs 15.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 vs 1.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 vs 63 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V7800
- Around 58% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1440 vs 640
- Around 97% better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2028 vs 1544
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1124.892 vs 516.994
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.448 vs 32.932
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 181.538 vs 111.138
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 vs 2862
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1440 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops vs 1,024 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2028 vs 1544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1124.892 vs 516.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.448 vs 32.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.538 vs 111.138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 vs 2862 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V7800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | ATI FirePro V7800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1544 | 2028 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 354 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | 4894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | 15.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | 1124.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 | 1.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | 39.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 | 181.538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 | 63 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | ATI FirePro V7800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Tropo | Cypress |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 26 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1007 | 1009 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $759 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1440 |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,154 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |