AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and NVIDIA Quadro K3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 654 MHz
• Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 32 GTexel / s vs 31.39 GTexel / s
• Around 11% higher pipelines: 640 vs 576
• Around 36% better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 753.4 gflops
• Around 61% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2800 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 353 vs 341
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9697 vs 4252
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.151 vs 14.45
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 516.994 vs 403.983
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.321 vs 0.992
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.932 vs 15.202
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 111.138 vs 24.266
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 2527
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 2527

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1652 vs 1541
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3505 vs 1667
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3326
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3505 vs 1667
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3326

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1541 1652
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	353 341
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9697 4252
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.151 14.45
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	516.994 403.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.321 0.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.932 15.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.138 24.266
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2862 2527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1667 3505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3326 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2862 2527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1667 3505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3326 3353

Compare specifications (specs)