AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs ATI Radeon E2400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M385X and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 25.7x more texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- 22.4x more pipelines: 896 vs 40
- 41.1x better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 38.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1994 vs 52
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1994 vs 52 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 267
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 vs 267 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M385X
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M385X | ATI Radeon E2400 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4079 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4079 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 | 287 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1994 | 52 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49760 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M385X | ATI Radeon E2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Strato | RV610 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 574 | 572 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 180 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |