AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M385X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M385X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49760 vs 14380
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 27 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 49760 vs 14380 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 896
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 579 vs 267
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5241 vs 1994
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops vs 1,971 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 vs 267 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5241 vs 1994 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3707 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M385X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M385X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4079 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4079 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 | 579 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1994 | 5241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 49760 | 14380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.336 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.121 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 156.419 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M385X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Strato | GK104 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 27 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 563 | 565 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M385X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
ATIFireMV 2250
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
AMDFirePro D700
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 M385X vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
