AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Nano and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano

3.8x more texture fill rate: 256.0 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1,024
3.8x better floating-point performance: 8,192 gflops vs 2,150 gflops

Texture fill rate	256.0 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4096 vs 1,024
Floating-point performance	8,192 gflops vs 2,150 gflops

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 175 Watt
10x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 500 MHz

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 175 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 500 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Name	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4607
PassMark - G3D Mark		5526
PassMark - G2D Mark		402
Geekbench - OpenCL		16049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		82.563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1266.506
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		70.779
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		252.607
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		7779
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3360

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Fiji	GM204
Design	AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Launch date	27 August 2015	18 August 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$649
Place in performance rating	491	495
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz
Compute units	64
Floating-point performance	8,192 gflops	2,150 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	4096	1,024
Stream Processors	4096
Texture fill rate	256.0 GTexel / s	67.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	175 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	8,900 million	5,200 million
Core clock speed		1050 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays	6
VGA
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	152 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	12
Mantle
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5.0
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s	160 GB / s
Memory bus width	4096 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus