AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Nano and NVIDIA GRID K240Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 256.0 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1536
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 8,192 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 28 June 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops vs 2,289 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K240Q
- 10x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 500 MHz
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Name | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | NVIDIA GRID K240Q |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4607 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2541 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6935 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6935 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3938 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3938 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3667 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3667 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | NVIDIA GRID K240Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Fiji | GK104 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $469 |
Place in performance rating | 491 | 489 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1536 |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 3,540 million |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 152 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |