AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Nano and AMD Radeon R9 M295X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
2.8x more texture fill rate: 256.0 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
2.8x better floating-point performance: 8,192 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 250 Watt

Launch date	27 August 2015 vs 23 November 2014
Texture fill rate	256.0 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4096 vs 2048
Floating-point performance	8,192 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	175 Watt vs 250 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M295X

Name	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	AMD Radeon R9 M295X
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4579
PassMark - G3D Mark		5150
PassMark - G2D Mark		832
Geekbench - OpenCL		26865
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		65.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		820.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		68.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		386.418
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3144
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		2045
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3144

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	Fiji	Amethyst
Design	AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series	AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch date	27 August 2015	23 November 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$649
Place in performance rating	497	498
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz
Compute units	64
Floating-point performance	8,192 gflops	2,961 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	4096	2048
Stream Processors	4096
Texture fill rate	256.0 GTexel / s	92.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	175 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	8,900 million	5,000 million
Core clock speed		723 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays	6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	152 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	Not Listed
Mantle
OpenCL	2.0	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Vulkan
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	4096 bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz
Memory type	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)	Not Listed
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore
DualGraphics
Switchable graphics