AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 Nano and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 11.9x more texture fill rate: 256.0 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 12.8x more pipelines: 4096 vs 320
- 19x better floating-point performance: 8,192 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 5 May 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops vs 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
- 8.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Name | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4579 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 353 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 565v | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Fiji | M96 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 5 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 499 | 496 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 320 |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 256.0 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | 514 million |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 152 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |