AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP and NVIDIA Quadro CX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 602 MHz
- Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 76.8 GTexel / s vs 38.5 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 192
- 5.3x better floating-point performance: 2,458 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 17 January 2017 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 76.8 GTexel / s vs 38.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 2,458 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro CX
Name | AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP | NVIDIA Quadro CX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65257 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 454 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP | NVIDIA Quadro CX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Baffin | GT200B |
Launch date | 17 January 2017 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 314 | 317 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 602 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,458 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 76.8 GTexel / s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |