AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon HD 7970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1206 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 137.5 GTexel / s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6600 MHz vs 1375 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 vs 84.381
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 1389.754
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 8.872
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 481.76
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 vs 9448
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 vs 9448
- Around 62% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3697 vs 2276
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 vs 22 December 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 137.5 GTexel / s vs 118.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz vs 1375 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34595 vs 34541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 vs 84.381 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 1389.754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 vs 8.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 vs 481.76 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 vs 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 vs 9448 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3697 vs 2276 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970
- 773.3x better floating-point performance: 3,789 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 vs 99.875
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1674
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 2443
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 vs 99.875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34595 | 34541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 84.381 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 1389.754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 8.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 101.929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 481.76 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3697 | 2276 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Ellesmere | Tahiti |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 4 August 2016 | 22 December 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | $549 |
Place in performance rating | 482 | 483 |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206 MHz | 925 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 926 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | 3,789 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 137.5 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
VGA | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Length | 274 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 264 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6600 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |