AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1206 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 137.5 GTexel / s versus 118.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6600 MHz versus 1375 MHz
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.543 versus 84.381
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 versus 1389.754
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 versus 8.872
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 versus 481.76
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9983 versus 9448
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9983 versus 9448
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3699 versus 2276
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 versus 22 December 2011 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz versus 925 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 137.5 GTexel / s versus 118.4 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz versus 1375 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34588 versus 34541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 versus 84.381 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 versus 1389.754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 versus 8.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 versus 481.76 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 versus 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 versus 9448 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3699 versus 2276 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- 773.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,789 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 versus 99.875
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 1674
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 2443
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 1674
Caractéristiques | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops versus 4.9 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 versus 99.875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 1674 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34588 | 34541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.543 | 84.381 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 | 1389.754 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 | 8.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 | 101.929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 | 481.76 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9983 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9983 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3699 | 2276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Ellesmere | Tahiti |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 4 August 2016 | 22 December 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549.99 | $549 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 482 | 483 |
Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 91.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1206 MHz | 925 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | 3,789 gflops |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 137.5 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
VGA | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Longeur | 274 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | 264 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6600 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |