AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
1342.9x more texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36319 vs 22896
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3316
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3316

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 6 February 2017
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1408 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 16 nm
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	36319 vs 22896
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695 vs 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3316

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 1036 MHz
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1445 MHz
Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
Around 67% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 3 GB
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 9813
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 9813
Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 390
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6957 vs 4724

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1076 MHz vs 1036 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz vs 1445 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 85 Watt
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10251 vs 9813
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10251 vs 9813
PassMark - G2D Mark	630 vs 390
PassMark - G3D Mark	6957 vs 4724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

10251

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9813

10251

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

36319

22896

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

390

630

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4724

6957

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3681

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3695

3681

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3316

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3316

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9813	10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9813	10251
Geekbench - OpenCL	36319	22896
PassMark - G2D Mark	390	630
PassMark - G3D Mark	4724	6957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695	3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695	3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3316
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		113.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1414.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		81.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		417.823
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2958

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5300M	NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Pascal
Code name	Navi 14	GP106
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	6 February 2017
Place in performance rating	384	387
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$585
Price now		$429.99
Value for money (0-100)		19.44
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz	1480 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1036 MHz	1076 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	254.3 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.138 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.069 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1408	768
Pixel fill rate	46.24 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	127.2 GTexel/s	94.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	4,400 million
Floating-point performance		3,031 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		201 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	168.0 GB/s	140.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	96 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5