AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 573.7x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel/s vs 68 GTexel / s
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s vs 68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
- 1813.3x better floating-point performance: 2,176 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 492 vs 361
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3559 vs 1896
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17210 vs 9416
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3692 vs 2296
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3692 vs 2296
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 492 vs 361 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3559 vs 1896 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17210 vs 9416 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3692 vs 2296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3692 vs 2296 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7970M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 492 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1896 | 3559 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9416 | 17210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 | 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 | 3692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.181 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1121.002 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.355 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.527 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 256.99 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde | Wimbledon |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 626 | 623 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1219 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 2,176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 19.50 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s | 68 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 32 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |