AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 560
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM and AMD Radeon Pro 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 907 MHz
- 672x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2296 vs 2280
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2296 vs 2280
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 907 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 vs 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 vs 2280 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 1548.3x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 361
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 1896
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 9416
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 361 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 vs 1896 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 vs 9416 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 724 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1896 | 3475 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9416 | 15796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2296 | 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2296 | 2280 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | Polaris 21 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 627 | 628 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1219 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,858 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.50 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel/s | 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 81.28 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 540 OEM with others
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
ATIFirePro V9800
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M270X
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4
