AMD Radeon RX 550 vs AMD FirePro W5100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 930 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 838.518
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 4397
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 4397

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 44.64 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• 1190x better floating-point performance: 1,428 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2978 vs 2690
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 vs 476
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11724 vs 11610
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.15 vs 33.507
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.199 vs 3.064
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 vs 52.533
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.258 vs 140.911
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 940
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2158
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 940
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2690 2978
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 531
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11610 11724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 35.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 838.518
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 3.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 57.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 163.258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 4397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 3356

Compare specifications (specs)