AMD Radeon RX 550 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 34.0 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 1345
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 335
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 10495
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 9.373
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 459.025
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 0.906
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 27.022
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 48.793
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 2636
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 2636

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770

• Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
• 1133.3x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2673 vs 940
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2799 vs 2158
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2673 vs 940
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2799 vs 2158

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2690 1345
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 335
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11610 10495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.507 9.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1037.305 459.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.064 0.906
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.533 27.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.911 48.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 2799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4485 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	940 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2158 2799

Compare specifications (specs)