AMD Radeon RX 550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 924 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 950 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 917.535
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 37.323
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 86.304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 January 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 924 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 917.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 37.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 vs 86.304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 1621.7x better floating-point performance: 1,946 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 vs 33.507
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 vs 3.064
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 vs 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 vs 3.064 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | 56.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | 917.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | 3.351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | 37.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | 86.304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Lexa | GM206 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 January 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Place in performance rating | 876 | 1154 |
Price now | $75 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | 950 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 924 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,946 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | 60.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 2,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |