AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 2.3x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 705 MHz
• 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 876 MHz
• 480.5x more texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 375 Watt
• 2000x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9164 vs 8987
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 656
• Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44855 vs 22732
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 128.135 vs 66.419
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2024.814 vs 1261.593
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 vs 7.89
• 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 vs 17.882
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 742.778 vs 309.857
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11075 vs 8124
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3722 vs 2413
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3367 vs 2226
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11075 vs 8124
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3722 vs 2413
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3367 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

• 4.1x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 1408
• 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
• 3.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 4892

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9164 8987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	784 656
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	44855 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	128.135 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2024.814 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.328 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	125.474 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	742.778 309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11075 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3367 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11075 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3367 2226
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4892 17055

Compare specifications (specs)