AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 162.36 GT/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8785 vs 6332
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 650
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44380 vs 20732
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12069 vs 8496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3687
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12069 vs 8496
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3687
- 15.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4813 vs 305
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1670 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8785 vs 6332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 vs 650 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 44380 vs 20732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 vs 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 vs 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 vs 305 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8785 | 6332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | 650 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 44380 | 20732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12069 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12069 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4813 | 305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 25 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 259 | 487 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Code name | GP107 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1670 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.4 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.2 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 59 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 1408 | |
| Texture fill rate | 162.36 GT/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,300 million |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | None |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||