AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 5500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1670 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1085 MHz
3.7x more texture fill rate: 162.36 GT/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8785 vs 3901
Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 521
3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44380 vs 11526
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12069 vs 4843
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3683
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3329
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12069 vs 4843
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3683
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3329
41.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4813 vs 117

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 Oct 2019 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed	1670 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1845 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate	162.36 GT/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8785 vs 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	747 vs 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	44380 vs 11526
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12069 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12069 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351 vs 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4813 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 150 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8785

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

747

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

44380

11526

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12069

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3351

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12069

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3351

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

4813

117

Name	AMD Radeon RX 5500	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	8785	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	747	521
Geekbench - OpenCL	44380	11526
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12069	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12069	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4813	117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		133.458

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 5500	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA	Maxwell
Launch date	7 Oct 2019	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	259	707
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Code name		GM107
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1845 MHz	1085 MHz
Compute units	22
Core clock speed	1670 MHz	1020 MHz
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.4 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.2 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate	59 GP/s
Stream Processors	1408
Texture fill rate	162.36 GT/s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Floating-point performance		1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology		28 nm
Pipelines		640
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 8-pin	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		5.4 GB/s
Shared memory		0
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
Display Connectors		2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
API support
DirectX		12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL		4.4