AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs AMD FirePro S9050
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500M and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 144.76 GT/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 7062
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 7062
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 7 August 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 vs 7062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 vs 7062 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4901 vs 3166
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 369 vs 336
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3617
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3345
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3617
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3345
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 vs 3166 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 369 vs 336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 vs 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 vs 3345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | AMD FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3166 | 4901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 369 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38633 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 | 7062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3617 | 6260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 | 13032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 | 7062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3617 | 6260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 | 13032 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5500M | AMD FirePro S9050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 1.0 |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 | 7 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 390 | 362 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Code name | Tahiti | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.26 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.63 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 52.6 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 1408 | |
| Texture fill rate | 144.76 GT/s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 254 mm | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 264 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5500M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5725
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 550v
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7690M
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 575X
AMDRadeon RX 5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000
