AMD Radeon RX 560 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 7418.2x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 11 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 1024 vs 400
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6571 vs 1937
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6571 vs 1937
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz vs 550 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 11 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 400 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 vs 1937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 vs 1937 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750
- 169.2x better floating-point performance: 440.0 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 60-80 Watt
| Floating-point performance | 440.0 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 60-80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 560 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3657 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 486 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | 1937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | 1937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 560 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | Madison |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 7 January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 513 | 1371 |
| Price now | $104.99 | |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200-1275 MHz | |
| Compute units | 14/16 | |
| Core clock speed | 1090-1175 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 440.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 400 |
| Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 11 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 627 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 560 with others
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
ATIFireGL V3350
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500 XT
AMDRadeon RX 560 vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Mobile
