AMD Radeon RX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1090-1175 MHz vs 1006 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1200-1275 MHz vs 1058 MHz
• 633.5x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 128.8 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 60-80 Watt vs 195 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2048 MB
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 vs 18376
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 vs 46.086
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 vs 36.463
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 vs 99.577
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 3666
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3306
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 3666
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3306

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

• Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
• 1188.6x better floating-point performance: 3,090.4 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 3657
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 vs 486
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 vs 775.281
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 vs 4.602
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 vs 6571
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 vs 6571
• Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2004 vs 1774

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3657 5590
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	486 531
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	57671 18376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.81 46.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	775.281 989.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.602 4.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.428 36.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	257.062 99.577
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6571 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6571 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3306
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1774 2004

Compare specifications (specs)