AMD Radeon RX 560 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 560 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090-1175 MHz versus 1006 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200-1275 MHz versus 1058 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 81.60 GTexel/s versus 128.8 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60-80 Watt versus 195 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2048 MB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- 3.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57671 versus 18376
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.81 versus 46.086
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.428 versus 36.463
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 257.062 versus 99.577
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 versus 3666
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 3306
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 versus 3666
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 3306
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 22 March 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090-1175 MHz versus 1006 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1200-1275 MHz versus 1058 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s versus 128.8 billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt versus 195 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2048 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 versus 18376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 versus 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 versus 36.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 versus 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3306 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1024
- 1188.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,090.4 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 versus 3657
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 531 versus 486
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 versus 775.281
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 versus 4.602
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 versus 6571
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 versus 6571
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2004 versus 1774
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1024 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops versus 2.6 TFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 versus 3657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 531 versus 486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 versus 775.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 versus 4.602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 versus 6571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 versus 6571 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 versus 1774 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3657 | 5590 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 486 | 531 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | 18376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.81 | 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 775.281 | 989.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.602 | 4.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.428 | 36.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 257.062 | 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6571 | 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6571 | 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3306 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1774 | 2004 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 560 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 22 March 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 513 | 544 |
Prix maintenant | $104.99 | $579.99 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 54.35 | 12.83 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200-1275 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 14/16 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090-1175 MHz | 1006 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2.6 TFLOPs | 3,090.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 81.60 GTexel/s | 128.8 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt | 195 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 170 mm | 10.0" (25.4 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2048 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |