AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 157.1 GTexel/s
• Around 64% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1408
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13688 vs 12776
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 881 vs 810
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64853 vs 62695
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 vs 187.131
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 vs 2548.187
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 vs 15.882
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 117.673
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 vs 901.388
• Around 29% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7710 vs 5978

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1130 MHz
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1560 MHz
• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 13621
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 13621

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13688 12776
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	881 810
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	64853 62695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	207.909 187.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3560.776 2548.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.486 15.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	148.938 117.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1111.648 901.388
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13621 17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13621 17812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	7710 5978

Compare specifications (specs)