AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 43% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 224.6 GTexel/s versus 157.1 GTexel/s
- Environ 64% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1408
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13685 versus 12776
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 880 versus 810
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 64860 versus 62624
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.909 versus 187.131
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3560.776 versus 2548.187
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 20.486 versus 15.882
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 versus 117.673
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 versus 901.388
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7709 versus 5978
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 versus 29 Oct 2019 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s versus 157.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1408 |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13685 versus 12776 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 versus 810 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64860 versus 62624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 versus 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 versus 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 versus 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 versus 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 versus 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7709 versus 5978 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1130 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 13621
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 13621
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1130 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 13621 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13685 | 12776 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 880 | 810 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64860 | 62624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7709 | 5978 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Navi 10 XLE | TU116 |
Date de sortie | 21 Jan 2020 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $229 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 192 | 207 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1130 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | 5.027 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1408 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 85.68 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 224.6 GTexel/s | 157.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 125 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10300 million | 6600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 9 inches (229 mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 350 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |