AMD Radeon RX 6550M vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6550M and AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6550M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 82% higher boost clock speed: 2840 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 21 Jan 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2840 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 181.8 GTexel/s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 477
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13616 vs 9629
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64785 vs 45053
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 181.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 477 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13616 vs 9629 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64785 vs 45053 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6550M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6550M | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 477 | 875 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9629 | 13616 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 45053 | 64785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6550M | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 24 | Navi 10 XLE |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 21 Jan 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 208 | 205 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2840 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Compute units | 16 | 36 |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1130 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 90.88 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 181.8 GTexel/s | 224.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5400 million | 10300 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6550M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6550M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon RX 6550M vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
AMDRadeon RX 6550M vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon RX 6550M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000
AMDRadeon RX 6550M vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6550M vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
