AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1130 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.938 vs 136.223
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1111.648 vs 1011.233
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 13 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 vs 136.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 vs 1011.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3714 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85798 vs 64824
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 207.909
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 3560.776
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 20.486
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 13621
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 13621
- Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7856 vs 7702
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85798 vs 64824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 207.909 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 3560.776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 20.486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 vs 7702 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13593 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 874 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64824 | 85798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | 232.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | 3728.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | 24.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | 136.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | 1011.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7702 | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 XLE | TU104 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 13 November 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $899 |
Place in performance rating | 205 | 207 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | 222.5 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | 14.24 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 13600 million |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 9.5 inches (241 mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |