AMD Radeon RX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- 3373.3x more texture fill rate: 199.7 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14115 vs 5923
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14115 vs 5923
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7991 vs 3717
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7991 vs 3717
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 19735 vs 3356
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 19735 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14115 vs 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14115 vs 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 59213 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12610 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14115 | 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14115 | 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 7 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 127 | 525 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 399.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.390 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5600 with others
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 6000
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
AMDRadeon RX 5600 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
