AMD Radeon RX 560D vs AMD Radeon E8950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and AMD Radeon E8950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 29 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950
- Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 65.8 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 896
- Around 94% better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 2,106 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s vs 65.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops vs 2,106 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8950
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | AMD Radeon E8950 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560D | AMD Radeon E8950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 29 September 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Place in performance rating | 731 | 732 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 735 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 192.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |