AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 425 MHz
- 12.9x more texture fill rate: 65.8 GTexel / s vs 5.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 83 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 6x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 28 July 2005 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 425 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s vs 5.1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 83 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 149 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
Code name | Polaris 21 | NV41 |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 28 July 2005 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $135.75 |
Place in performance rating | 731 | 729 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $138.75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 425 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 5.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 83 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |