AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA GeForce 940A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and NVIDIA GeForce 940A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 1029 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 65.8 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 2,106 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2002 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 3615
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 3615
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 1029 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops vs 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2002 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3615 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940A
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940A
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA GeForce 940A |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3361 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1107 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA GeForce 940A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GM108 |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Place in performance rating | 731 | 723 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |