AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1275 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 1880.2x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 59% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1826 vs 1151
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20572 vs 10427
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 226
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3168 vs 3072
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 10 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 vs 1151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 vs 10427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 226 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3168 vs 3072 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- 534.2x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 | 1151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 | 10427 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 226 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3168 | 3072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Baffin | GK104 |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 10 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 853 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 915 MHz |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 797 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 1,389 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |