AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 1221.2x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- 6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1826 vs 305
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 25 October 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 vs 305 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1175 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1275 MHz
- 822.3x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 20572
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 383
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 3168
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1175 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1275 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 vs 20572 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 383 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 vs 3168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 | 305 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 | 20732 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 650 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3168 | 6332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Baffin | GP107 |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 487 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 2,138 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |