AMD Radeon RX 560X vs AMD FirePro W4300

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 560X

AMD FirePro W4300

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 930 MHz
1828x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5698 vs 3572
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5698 vs 3572
Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 669 vs 659
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3553 vs 2818
Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16430 vs 10312

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 April 2018 vs 1 December 2015
Core clock speed	1175 MHz vs 930 MHz
Texture fill rate	81.60 GTexel/s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1024 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5698 vs 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5698 vs 3572
PassMark - G2D Mark	669 vs 659
PassMark - G3D Mark	3553 vs 2818
Geekbench - OpenCL	16430 vs 10312

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

549.2x better floating-point performance: 1,428 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 4873
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 4873
5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3357
5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3357

Specifications (specs)
Floating-point performance	1,428 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	6161 vs 4873
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	6161 vs 4873
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	17597 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	17597 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5698

3572

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5698

3572

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

669

659

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3553

2818

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

16430

10312

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4873

6161

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4873

6161

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

17597

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

17597

Name	AMD Radeon RX 560X	AMD FirePro W4300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5698	3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5698	3572
PassMark - G2D Mark	669	659
PassMark - G3D Mark	3553	2818
Geekbench - OpenCL	16430	10312
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	4873	6161
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	4873	6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	17597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	17597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		31.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		828.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		59.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		152.484

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 560X	AMD FirePro W4300
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 2.0
Code name	Polaris 21	Bonaire
Design	Radeon RX 500X Series
GCN generation	4th Gen
Launch date	3 April 2018	1 December 2015
Place in performance rating	384	416
Type	Desktop, Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1275 MHz
Compute units	14/16
Core clock speed	1175 MHz	930 MHz
Floating-point performance	2.6 TFLOPs	1,428 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	768
Pixel fill rate	20.40 GP/s
Render output units	16
Stream Processors	896/1024
Texture fill rate	81.60 GTexel/s	44.64 GTexel / s
Texture Units	64
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	2,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	170 mm	171 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	96 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support