NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 560X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1175 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1275 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 81.60 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7682 vs 5698
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7682 vs 5698
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41349 vs 16390
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6923 vs 3553
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 3 April 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1175 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1275 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 81.60 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 vs 5698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 vs 5698 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41349 vs 16390 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 vs 3553 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 vs 3703
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 vs 3703
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 669 vs 430
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 vs 3703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 vs 3703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 vs 430 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | 5698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | 5698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | 4873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | 4873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41349 | 16390 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | 669 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 | 3553 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 560X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Polaris 21 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 3 April 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 381 | 384 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1275 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1175 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | 20.40 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,000 million |
| Compute units | 14/16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 PRO
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300M
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A370M
