AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs AMD Radeon RX 560X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5300M and AMD Radeon RX 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1445 MHz vs 1275 MHz
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 127.2 GTexel/s vs 81.60 GTexel/s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9813 vs 5698
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9813 vs 5698
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36495 vs 16461
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4494 vs 3553
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 3 April 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz vs 1275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s vs 81.60 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 vs 5698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 vs 5698 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 vs 16461 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4494 vs 3553 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1036 MHz
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 85 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 669 vs 372
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 vs 3695
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 vs 3695
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 1036 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 vs 372 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon RX 560X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9813 | 5698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9813 | 5698 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36495 | 16461 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 | 669 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4494 | 3553 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 4873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 4873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M | AMD Radeon RX 560X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 3 April 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 387 | 390 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1445 MHz | 1275 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | 14/16 |
Core clock speed | 1036 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 254.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.138 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.069 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.24 GPixel/s | 20.40 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 127.2 GTexel/s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDMI | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |