AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16667 vs 11748
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 483
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 vs 168.08
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 1935.102
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 vs 22.794
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 111.023
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 1001.496
- Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9486 vs 6841
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16667 vs 11748 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 vs 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 vs 22.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 1001.496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 vs 6841 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78123 vs 77153
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 14699
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3720
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3369
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 14699
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3720
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3369
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 vs 77153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16667 | 11748 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 483 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 | 78123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 22.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1001.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 8055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 8055 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 | 6841 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU106 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | |
Place in performance rating | 148 | 178 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | 1185 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 885 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 10,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | None |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |