Apple M1 Pro 14-core vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 Pro 14-core and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 Pro 14-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20379 vs 14699
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20379 vs 14699
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7440 vs 3720
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7440 vs 3720
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6721 vs 3369
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6721 vs 3369
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 Oct 2021 vs 7 July 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20379 vs 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20379 vs 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 vs 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 vs 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 vs 3369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 vs 3369 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1296 MHz
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77476 vs 39965
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1296 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77476 vs 39965 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 Pro 14-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Apple M1 Pro 14-core | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39965 | 77476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20379 | 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20379 | 14699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 | 3369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 | 3369 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2134 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Apple M1 Pro 14-core | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 26 Oct 2021 | 7 July 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 163 | 162 |
| Architecture | RDNA | |
| Code name | Navi 10 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.644 TFLOPS | 9.75 TFLOPs |
| Pipelines | 14 | |
| Render output units | 56 | 64 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Transistor count | 10.3 B | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||

