AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 230 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14498 vs 13932
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 815
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 171.616
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 16.925
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 247.788

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69812 vs 66234
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 3686.851
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1195.863 vs 1036.448
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 vs 11536
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3723
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3366
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 vs 11536
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3723
• 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3366

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14498 13932
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	889 815
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	66234 69812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	209.509 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686.851 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.941 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	250 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1036.448 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11536 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3723 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3366 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11536 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3723 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3366 30936

Compare specifications (specs)