AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1440 MHz
• Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 791
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 153.677

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1725 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 14498
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 66232
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 209.509
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 3686.851
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 21.941
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1036.448
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 11536
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 11536
• Around 64% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 8500

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14498 18872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	889 791
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	66232 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	209.509 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686.851 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.941 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	250 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1036.448 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11536 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3723 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3366 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11536 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3723 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3366 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	8500 13943

Compare specifications (specs)