AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 versus 791
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 153.677
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 versus 791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 153.677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 versus 14499
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 versus 66238
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 209.509
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 3686.851
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 21.941
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 1036.448
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 versus 11536
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 versus 11536
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 versus 8499
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 versus 14499 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 versus 66238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 209.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 3686.851 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 21.941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 versus 1036.448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 versus 11536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 versus 11536 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 versus 8499 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14499 | 18872 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 | 791 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66238 | 74179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 488.989 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 5451.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 41.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 153.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1534.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 19571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 | 13943 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $6,299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 177 | 111 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 18,600 million |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
IntelArc A730M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
