NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and AMD Radeon RX 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1465 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- 508.9x more texture fill rate: 126.4 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 965 vs 881
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 7 July 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1465 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 965 vs 881 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14403 vs 11937
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66014 vs 60565
- Around 36% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8497 vs 6262
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 207.741
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 2525.787
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 19.08
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 87.152
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 vs 806.848
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14403 vs 11937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66014 vs 60565 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8497 vs 6262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 207.741 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 2525.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 19.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 87.152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 806.848 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 965 | 881 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11937 | 14403 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60565 | 66014 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6262 | 8497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 | 209.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2525.787 | 3686.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 | 21.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.152 | 250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA |
Code name | GA106 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 7 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 191 | 193 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1465 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | 15.9 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 110.4 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 10.3 B |
Compute units | 36 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |