AMD Radeon RX 580X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 544.5x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4909 vs 3716
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4909 vs 3716
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18294 vs 3357
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18294 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 10 March 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4909 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4909 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- 1829x better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 11616
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 11616
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 885
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18558 vs 7798
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62406 vs 41822
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 11616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 11616 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 885 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18558 vs 7798 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62406 vs 41822 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 580X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11616 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11616 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4909 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4909 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 937 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7798 | 18558 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41822 | 62406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9870 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 580X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GP102 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 10 March 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 162 | 201 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $826.98 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | 11,340 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 11,800 million |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 11 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 352 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 11008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 580X with others
AMDRadeon RX 580X vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon RX 580X vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
AMDRadeon RX 580X vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo
AMDRadeon RX 580X vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
AMDRadeon RX 580X vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
AMDRadeon RX 580X vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
