AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 517.4x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- Around 31% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1890 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3680
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3680
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3336
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 10 July 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 732 vs 667
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12470 vs 8574
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 vs 5140
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 vs 5140
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 vs 667 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12470 vs 8574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 vs 5140 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 | 732 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8574 | 12470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4431 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65451 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 174.714 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Vega 10 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 10 July 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 208 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |