AMD Radeon RX 590 vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 3783.7x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 vs 4551
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 vs 4551
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 vs 2 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 vs 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- 265.1x better floating-point performance: 1,882 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3716
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3359
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3716
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 1,882 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9393 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45826 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 6886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 17482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 6886 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 17482 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4757 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 30 | Bonaire |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 | 2 September 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 273 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | 1,882 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 85 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 2,080 million |
Pipelines | 896 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 183 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |