AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs AMD Radeon RX 590
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon RX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47784 vs 45591
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 15 November 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47784 vs 45591 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 164.8 GTexel/s
- 10.4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 vs 10296
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 vs 10296
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 678
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9374 vs 9198
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1469 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 164.8 GTexel/s |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 vs 10296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 vs 10296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 vs 678 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9374 vs 9198 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47784 | 45591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 13383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 13383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3359 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 678 | 789 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9198 | 9374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1081 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 12 | Polaris 30 |
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 15 November 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 282 | 280 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | 36 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1469 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | 49.54 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | 222.48 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
