NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 590

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1469 MHz
• Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1545 MHz
• Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 175 Watt
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10143 vs 9462
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55386 vs 46718
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.926 vs 137.469
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 802.026 vs 762.142
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 13383
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 13383

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590

• Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 752
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 vs 1940.024
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.352 vs 11.167
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 vs 102.69
• Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4763 vs 4669

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10143 9462
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	752 796
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55386 46718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	178.926 137.469
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1940.024 2083.862
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.167 12.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.69 139.477
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	802.026 762.142
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 13383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13569 13383
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4669 4763

Compare specifications (specs)