AMD Radeon RX 6550M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6550M and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6550M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 2840 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 460.5x more texture fill rate: 181.8 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 1 October 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2840 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 181.8 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- 3.8x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1024
- 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 495
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 9786
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63932 vs 45426
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 vs 495 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 vs 9786 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 vs 45426 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6550M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6550M | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 495 | 725 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9786 | 15451 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 45426 | 63932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6550M | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 24 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 1 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 207 | 204 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
| Price now | $4,403.52 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2840 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Compute units | 16 | |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 90.88 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 181.8 GTexel/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5400 million | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 9016 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
